Sustainable Development and Market Competitiveness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2007.1.05Abstract
The study is focused on the relationship between sustainable development and price and non-price competitiveness on the world market. We argue that this relationship is always positive in the long run because of two main reasons: first, any decrease in energy and material consumption per unit of product has double positive effects: (a) cost saving and (b) lower emission of pollutants. Second, goods with higher environmental parameters receive higher assessment from the consumers which improves the market positions of their producers and exporters.However, the same relationship has contradictive character in the short run. In principle, the environmentally friendly technologies and products suppose higher initial investments. It may lead to competitive disadvantage for some companies or even some national economies if their environmental standards are higher than the same standards in their trade partners. The author comes to the conclusion that sustainable development and market competitiveness could be mutually supportive if the WTO and other international bodies achieve certain harmonization of the environmental standards.References
Shimbun, A. (2007). Japan needs an eco-tax. Forest conservation archives. URL: http://forest.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=25288 (accessed 2008-03-14)
Miura, J. (2004). Japan: New gas tax ineffective. Yomiuri Shinbun. URL: http://www.climateark.org/articles/reader.asp?linkid=34851 (accessed 2008-05-27)
Hoerner, J. & Muller, Fr. (1996). Carbon Taxes for Climate Protection in a Competitive World. Swiss Federal Office for Foreign Economic Affairs. URL: https://www.sustainableeconomy.org/swiss.pdf (accessed accessed at)
European Commission (2004). Study on the economic and environmental implications of the use of environmental taxes and charges in the European Union and its member states (DG TAXUD C5). URL: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/taxation/environmental_taxes.htm (accessed from)
Parry, I. & Bento, Ant. (1999). Tax Deductible Spending, Environmental Policy, and the "Double Divident" Hypothesis. Resources for the Future. URL: http://www.rff.org (accessed from)
Sterner, Th. (1994). Policy instruments for a Sustainable Economy. Economic Policies for Sustainable development (Ed. Sterner, Thomas), pp. p.12.
Hoerner, A. (1998). The Role of Border Tax Adjustment in Environmental Taxation: Theory and U.S. Experience. Working paper, presented at the International Workshop on Market Based Instruments.
Euroactiv (2007). OECD blasts EU biofuels rush. URL: http://www.euractiv.com/en/transport/oecd-blasts-eu-biofuels-rush/article-166628 (accessed 2008-04-17)
Presidency Conclusions (No. 7619/1/05 Rev. 1). (2005). Council of the European Union. URL: http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/eu/ec/84335.pdf (accessed 22 and 23 March, 2005)
Leonidov, A. et al. (1995). Association of Bulgaria with the European Union (Structural Adaptation of the National Economy). V. Tarnovo: Abagar.
Gechev, R (2002). Environmental taxes and economic growth. Consolidation of Governance and Business in the Czech Republic and in the European Union, pp. 25-43.
Klarer, J., Francis, P., & McNicholas, J. (1999). Improving Environment and Economy: The Potential of Economic Incentives for Environmental Improvements and Sustainable Development in Countries with Economies in Transition. The Regional Environmental center for Central and Eastern Europe.
van Ark, Bart & Piatkowski, Marcin (2004). Productivity, innovation and ICT in Old and New Europe (No. GD-69). Groningen Growth and Development Centre. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-004-0012-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Rumen Gechev (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
