Activation Policies: New Modes of Governance and the Issue of Responsibility

Jean–Michel Bonvin

doi:10.37075/YB.2008.1.08

Authors

Prof. Dr Jean–Michel Bonvin University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2008.1.08

Abstract

Most activation policies are based on a simplistic conception of responsibility: behaving responsibly coincides with quickly reintegrating the labour market. Local welfare agents are called to push beneficiaries to actively endorse this goal. But the issue of responsibility is much more complex. Drawing on Sen’s capability approach, this article suggests that responsibilisation of recipients requires both empowerment and granting them more real freedom of choice on the labour market. Against the present trend toward hypertrophying individual responsibility, it calls for a more equilibrated balance between individual and social responsibility. The objective is not to define an impracticable ideal of responsibility, but to provide a yardstick for assessing activation programmes.

References

Benarrosh, Y. (2006). Recevoir les chômeurs de l'ANPE : L'institution entre don et contrat. Paris: L'Harmattan.

Bonvin, Jean-Michel (2005). La démocratie dans l'approche d'Amartya Sen. L Economie politique, 27, 24-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/leco.027.0024

Bonvin, J.-M. (2006). Assessing the European social model against the capability approach. Unwrapping the European social model (Ed. M. Jepsen and A. Serrano), pp. 213-232.

Bonvin, J.-M. & Farvaque, N. (2007). A capability approach to individualised and tailor-made activation. Making it personal. Individualising activation services in the EU (Ed. R. Van Berkel and B. Valkenburg), pp. 45-66.

JM Bonvin & E Moachon (2007). The impact of contractualism in social policies: the case of active labour market policies in Switzerland. International journal of sociology and social policy, 27(9/10), 401-412.

Vando Borghi & Rik van Berkel (2007). Individualised service provision in an era of activation and new governance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(9/10), 413-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710822101

Oliver Bruttel (2005). Delivering active labour market policy through vouchers: experiences with training vouchers in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(3), 391-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305056809

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

C Europeia (2006). Employment in Europe, 2006. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/9780816683161

B Gazier (1999). Employability: concepts and policies: report 1998. European Employment Observatory Research Network, European Commission.

Neil Gilbert (2002). Transformation of the welfare state : the silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Joel F. Handler (2004). Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe: The Paradox of Inclusion. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511522338

Gordon Tullock & Albert O. Hirschman (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2325604

Bob Jessop (2010). The transition to post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state. Towards a post-fordist welfare state? (Ed. R. Burrows and B. Loader), pp. 13-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203359846_chapter_2