Methodological Problems in Research of the Economic Science in the Content of Political Economy and Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2011.1.07Abstract
This study is dedicated to some methodological problems and approaches, related to the study of political economy and economics, as well as the accent on clarification of definitions, the subject and the object of the political economy and economics, and the evolution in understanding the modern political economy. The main purposes of this study are: implementation of a greater clarification in methodological aspect in the concept of the both directions of the economic study – political economy and economics, and lighting of the combination of ideas and understandings in the research of the subject of the modern political economy.The developed thesis is that the review and the study of the economic science nowadays should be conducted not backwards to the classic political economy, but forward to the political economy – as a generalizing science of modern political-economic system. Along the long way of development of the political economy, the rich characteristics, the exhibited concepts, the developed ideas, the revealed facts, the found principles and the used instruments are also evidence for that in the modern ideas of the economic science there is a place in partnership for the different competitive directions of the economic science – the political economy and the economics. The modern political economy should be reviewed as a direction of the economic science together with the other direction – what is the economics. The political economy is an independent science within the system of economic sciences. It was historically thus established, so that its subject always related to production and turnover in its integrity. Therefore it was necessary for the science in its base. The market is in the first place for the economics, and its subject, to a great extent, is limited within these frames, dependent on the poor resources and behavior, where the limited, though rational beginning of the economic subject lies. At the same time, the political economy is oriented towards revealing of objective laws related to development of the human society, it historically analyses its development, it explains the economic reality of the contemporary world, it studies the influence of the political process related to undertaking choice decisions. The subject world of the political economy comes to new dimensions. It responds to the theoretical eclecticism, the comparative institutional analysis, the empirics, the importance of economical dynamics and evolution, the formal political analysis, the evolutionary approach to economic research, to the understanding of global political economy, etc. It is that the political-economic approach is objectively called upon and able to develop methodological instrumentation for the research of complex relations, formed in the modern civilization.References
Koeva, Stefka (2007). Contemporary Political Economy: Traditional Approaches and New Directions. Economic Thought Journal.
Acemoglu, D. & Yared, Pierre (2010). Political Limits to Globalization. American Economic Review, 100(NBER Working Paper 15694), 83-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.83
Anderson, E. J. (2011). Public Policymaking. Boston, USA: Wadsworth. ISBN: 9780618215515
Gilpin, R. (2003). Global Political Economy. Sofia: Damyan Yakov. ISBN: 954-527-212-0
Besley, T. (2004). The New political economy. The Economic Journal, 117(524), F570-F587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02097.x
Clark, B. S. (1998). Political Economy: a comparative approach. Westport, USA: Greenwood Publ. Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1060314
David, Paul A. (2001). Path dependence, its critics, and the quest for 'historical economics'. Evolution and Path dependence in Economic Ideas (Ed. Garrouste, P. and Ioannides, S.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781950227.00006
Groenewegen, P. (2008). Political economy. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2012 Version. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336583.1401
JD Gwartney & RE Wagner (1988). Public choice and the conduct of representative government. Public Choice and Constitutional Economics (Ed. Gwartney, J. D. and Wagner, R. E.).
Keynes, N. J. (1999). The Scope and Method of Political Economy. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Marshall, A. (2006). Principles of Economics. N.Y.: Cosimo Inc.
Mill, J. S. (1974). Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. Clifton, N. J.: Augustos Kelly.
Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy (Zeuthen Lectures). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Robbins, Lionel (1945). Essay On The Nature And Significance Of Economic Science. London: MacMillan and Co.
Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1993. (2011). URL: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1993/north-lecture.html (accessed 2015-02-04)
Hayek, Friedrich (2009). "The Use of Knowledge in Society". The Economic Nature of the Firm, 63-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817410.007
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Mariya Marikina (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.