Non-State Agents in Contentious Politics: Transnational Networks of Soros’ Open Society and Gulen’s Hizmet Movement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2018.1.05Keywords:
Non-state actors, Transnational networks, Contentious politics, Open society, Gulen MovementAbstract
Although governments as major actors and national political structures are still taken for granted, they start experiencing influences and pressures from non-state actors that perform as “agents of change” developing their own network structures. It is not that states functions and capabilities will diminish soon, but they will have to live up with agents and structures that will persistently question and challenge their authority and legitimacy.The aim of this paper is to review the impact of transnationally operating non-state agents (Gulen’s Hizmet Movement and Soros’ Open Society) on domestic political structures and social change in two countries (Turkey and Hungary) and discuss why in some cases contentious politics (tension and hostility of relations between these non-state agents and national governments) occur on what could be described as “authority challenge”.Challenging official authority and power usually occurs when non-state agents are engaged with promoting agenda and/ or policy initiatives that run counter to state government policies. In such circumstances non-state actors can perform as opposition alternative, reaching the public and influencing its opinion. On grounds of protecting national security, governments counteract by initiating alleged prosecution against non-state actors’ representatives, followers and supporters accusing them of state subversion activities and calling the public for unanimous support for the government against the “existential threat”.Illustrating this argument, the paper draws on empirical evidence presenting a comparative analysis of two cases that highlight specific features of confrontation and tensions between governments and transnational non-state actors. The cases refer to Hungary and Turkey and the confrontation in recent years between Orban’s government in Hungary and Soros’ Open Society, on one hand, and between Turkish President Erdogan and Gulen’s Hizmet movement, on the other.References
Buckley, N. & Byrne, A. (2018). The Rise and Rise of Viktor Orban. The Financial Times. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/dda50a3e-0095-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5 (accessed 25.01.2018)
Donadio, R. (2018). How Hungary Ran George Soros Out of Town. The Atlantic. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/05/orban-european-union-soros/560480/ (accessed 15 May 2018)
Dunai, M. (2018). Soros foundation attacks 'stifling' Orban law as Hungary exit looms. Reuters.com. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-soros-hungary-migration/soros-foundation-attacks-stifling-orban-law-as-hungary-exit-looms-idUSKBN1HR0KV (accessed 20.04.2018)
Geissel, B. (2006). Transnational Networks of Local and Global Civil Society as Response to New Challenges. World Society Focus Paper Series.
Herszenhorn, D. (2017). Hungary’s Freudian political fight: Orbán vs Soros. Politico. URL: https://www.politico.eu/article/hungarys-freudian-political-fight-orban-vs-soros/ (accessed 27.04.2017)
Huntington, Samuel P. (1973). Transnational Organizations in World Politics. World Politics, 25, 333-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010115
Jacobson, Harold K. (2000). International Institutions and System Transformation. Annual Review of Political Science, pp. 149-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.149
Keck, M. & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20048985
Kenes, B. (2018). Islamist vs. Islamic: Erdogan's deep-rooted hatred of the Gülen movement. Politurco. URL: http://www.politurco.com/islamist-vs-islamic-erdogans-deep-rooted-hatred-of-the-gulen-movement.html (accessed April 28, 2018)
Nye, Joseph S. & Keohane, Robert O. (1971). Transnational Relations and World Politics: A Conclusion. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300026412
Smith, J. (2012). Transnational Activism and Global Social Change. Global Civil Society: Shifting Powers in a Shifting World (Ed. Heidi Moksnes and Mia Melin).
Tarrow, S. (2005). The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious Politics. Oxford University Press.
Tinc, T. (2017). Gulen Movement: Creating An Elite to Lead the State; Development and Cooperation. Democracy and Cooperation. URL: https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/turkish-guelen-movement-expanding-worldwide-opinions-differ-reasons-why (accessed 26.11.2017)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Plamen Ralchev (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.