UNCITRAL – Traditions and Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2018.1.03Keywords:
UNCITRAL, Legal instruments, International commerce, International trade law, Traditions, PerspectivesAbstract
The subject of this paper is to identify the role and importance of the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) – one of most popular UN organizations. Its main functions and objectives have been analyzed, especially with regard to the law-making process. The main goal of this piece of research is to outline the perspectives of UNCITRAL pertaining to the improvement of its functions and texts and, mostly of the model laws. The coordination between organizations assisting the UNCITRAL’s activities in the attempt to harmonize and modernize its legal instruments has been given priority in this paper.The UNCITRAL rules are applicable also in Bulgaria and this is one of most important reasons of this study.References
Spasova, Tz. (2015). UNCITRAL and the Harmonization and Modernization of International Trade Law. Historical Traditions and Contemporary Law of International Trade, pp. 430-438.
Julian, D. M., Loukas, A. M., & Kroll, S. M. (2003). Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748937654-137
Caron, David D, Pellonpää, Matti, & Caplan, Lee M (2006). The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules : A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199297597.book.1
JAE Faria (2005). The Relationship between Formulating Agencies in International Legal Harmonization: Competition, Cooperation, or Peaceful Coexistence-A Few Remarks on the …. Lay L Rev., 51, 269-280.
Goode, Roy, Kronke, Herbert, & McKendrick, Ewan (2015). Transnational Commercial Law. NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198735441.001.0001
Gutteridge, H. C. (1949). Comparative Law. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3309479
Juenger, F. K. (2000). The lex mercatoria and private international law. Univ. I. V, pp. 171-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/5.1.171
Julian, D. M., Loukas, A. M., & Kroll, S. M. (2003). Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. The Hague: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748937654-137
Marinova, D. (2013). Dogovorat za mejdunarodna targovska prodajba na stoki. Sofia: Feneya.
JS Rogers (1995). Policy perspectives on revised UCC Article 8. UCLA L Rev, 1431-1448.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Diana Marinova (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
