Relevant and Quasi-Relevant Management Accounting Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2023.2.04Keywords:
Management accounting, Behavioral accounting research (BAR), Qualitative characteristics of useful accounting information, Cognitive biases, UncertaintyAbstract
This paper examines two criteria for relevance of management accounting information: the decision and the decision process. The study aims to show whether the information that is relevant to both the decision and the process of decision making (process-relevant) can lead to predictably different decisions compared to the information that is relevant to the decision but irrelevant to the decision process (process-quasi-relevant). Based on Drury (2018, p. 285) a field experiment was designed to test the hypothesis employing 352 students and PhD students. The results generally support the view that process relevance seems to be a superior to decision relevance as a qualitative characteristic of useful management accounting information. Fully rational agents would derive the same meaning, and thus the same utility, from both process-relevant information and process-quasi relevant information. Boundedly rational agents, however, as confirmed by the field experiment, derive different utility from the process-relevant information and the process-quasi-relevant information. If management accounting aims to partner managers in decision making, the focus of generating and communicating the information should be on the core driver of the better decisions, and this intuition suggests that the decision process should be a pivot for the management accounting information.References
Sibony, Olivier (2020). You Are About to Make a Big Mistake. Sofia: Iztok-Zapad. ISBN: 978-619-01-0725-5
American Accounting Association (AAA) Management Accounting Committee (1962). Report of The Management Accounting Committee. The Accounting Review, 37(3), 523-537.
… Prepare a Statement of Basic Accounting Theory (1966). A statement of basic accounting theory. The Accounting Review, 44, 43-76.
American Accounting Association (1969). Report of committee on managerial decision models. The Accounting Review, 44, 43-76.
American Accounting Association (AAA) Committee on Management Accounting (1970). Committee Report: Committee on Management Accounting. The Accounting Review, 45, 1-8.
American Accounting Association (1974). Report of the committee on concepts and Standards—Internal planning and control. The Accounting Review, 49, 79-96.
Birnberg, Jacob G. & Shields, Jeffrey F. (1989). Three Decades of Behavioral Accounting Research: A Search For Order. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 23-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-5328406
Bruns, W. J. (1968). Accounting Information and Decision-Making: Some Behavioral Hypotheses. The Accounting Review, 43(3), 469-480.
Burchell, Stuart, Clubb, Colin, Hopwood, Anthony, Hughes, John, & Nahapiet, Janine (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting Organizations and Society, 5(1), 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90017-3
Campfield, William L. (1959). RE-EXAMINATION OF BASES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR APPLYING ACCOUNTING JUDGMENT. The Accounting Review, 34(4), 555-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-7057818
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) (2017). Global Management Accounting Principles ©. Effective management accounting: Improving decisions and building successful organisations. London: CIMA. URL: https://www.cgma.org (accessed May 2023)
Chua, W.F. (1986). Radical Development in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601-632.
Collins, F., Munter, P., & Finn, D.W. (1987). The Budgeting Games People Play. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 29-49.
Davidson, H.J. & Trueblood, R.M. (1961). Accounting for Decision-Making. The Accounting Review, 36(4), 577-582.
Demski, J. (1973). The General Impossibility of Normative Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 48(4), 718-723.
Drury, Colin (2018). Management and cost accounting, 10th ed. Andover, Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Evans, John H., Hannan, R. Lynn, Krishnan, Ranjani, & Moser, Donald V. (2001). Honesty in Managerial Reporting. The Accounting Review, 76(4), 537-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.4.537
Feltham, G.A. (1968). The Value of Information. The Accounting Review, 43(4), 684-696.
Hammond, J., Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1998). The Hidden Traps in Decision Making. Harvard Business Review. URL: https://hbr.org/1998/09/the-hidden-traps-in-decision-making-2 (accessed May 2023)
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. URL: https://www.ifrs.org/ (accessed May 2023)
Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., & Sibony, O. (2011). Before You Make that Big Decision…. Harvard Business Review, 51-60.
Kim, D.C. (1992). Risk Preferences in Participative Budgeting. The Accounting Review, 67(2), 303-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-9605305887
Kircher, P. (1961). Theory and Research in Management Accounting. The Accounting Review, 36(1), 43-49.
Littleton, A.C. (1938). The Relation of Function to Principles. The Accounting Review, 13(3), 233-241.
Levine, D.M., Stephan, D.F., Krehbiel, T.C., & Berenson, M.L. (2008). Statistics for Managers: Using Microsoft® Excel. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Lovallo, D. & Sibony, O. (2010). The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quarterly, 1-14.
Moonitz, M. & Nelson, C. L. (1960). Recent Developments in Accounting Theory. The Accounting Review, 35(2), 206-217.
Murphy, G.I. (1976). A Numerical Representation of Some Accounting Conventions. The Accounting Review, 51(2), 277-286.
Newbold, P. (1988). Statistics for Business and Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2347351
Nichol, Jennifer E. (2018). The Effects of Contract Framing on Misconduct and Entitlement. The Accounting Review, 94(3), 329-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52260
Raun, D.L. (1961). Accounting for Decisions. The Accounting Review, 36(3), 460-471.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2001). Behavioral Management Accounting. Westport: Quorum Books.
Shwayder, Keith (1968). Relevance. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), 86-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2490125
Sterling, Robert R. (1967). A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory: A Review Article. Journal of Accounting Research, 5(1), 95-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2489988
Thaler, R.H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural Economics. UK: Penguin Random House. ISBN: 0-241-95122-4
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Uecker, Wilfred C. (1981). Behavioral Accounting Research As A Source For Experiential Teaching Aids: An Example. The Accounting Review, 56(2), 366-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4482678
LD Waller (2008). Statistics for Business. 1. utg. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Musov (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
